![]() ![]() This meant that many apps, including Photoshop, were running through emulation via Apple's Rosetta 2 technology. And when companies compete, the customers win.Apple M1 chip-based Macs came out in November, but many popular apps needed time to fully convert to Apple's new ARM-based chips (programs were written for the x86-based Intel processors). What’s happening here is a re-igniting of competition. This isn’t about Apple Silicon vs Intel vs AMD and whether you’re a Mac or a PC. Whether you love or hate Apple is irrelevant. Will ARM-based PCs take off now that more and more software companies are taking the time to optimize their apps for Apple Silicon, or are AMD’s latest Ryzen processors efficient-yet-powerful enough to keep creators from jumping ship? And how can Intel possibly fight a war on two fronts, with AMD killing it on x86 and Apple blowing minds on ARM? What remains to be seen is how Intel, AMD, and the PC market in general will choose to respond. ![]() ![]() When companies like Adobe take full advantage of what Apple has created in the M1, the results are undeniable. Benchmarks like this help to prove that neither of these statements are as hyperbolic as they might initially seem to be. I said that the M1 MacBook Pro “changes everything” and called the M1 Mac mini “the best Mac for most photographers,” and while I was pretty confident, snarky comments have a way of making you doubt your own sanity. I thought the first run was a mistake by the 6th I was forced to start believing my eyes.Īs a reviewer, you’re always worried that you’ve over-sold something that really impressed you. To see the scores jump this much, when Rosetta 2 was already doing such a great job with the x86 version of Photoshop, was frankly mind-blowing. Even a $6,700 fully-loaded 16-inch MacBook Pro with an 8-core Intel Core i9 and discrete GPU takes 1 minute and 52 seconds.Īll of this from a chip that sips power so slowly that we were able to get almost 16 hours of 4K video playback out of the M1 MacBook Pro we reviewed in December.įinal Thoughts: What Does This Mean for Creatives?Īfter the lackluster improvements that we saw when we compared Apple Silicon-optimized Lightroom against the x86 version running via Rosetta 2, we didn’t come into this test with high hopes. The M1 Mac mini running optimized Photoshop does this same task in 1 minute and 14 seconds. What does that mean in real terms? An Intel-based 13-inch MacBook Pro with a 2.3GHz quad-core i7 and 32GB of RAM takes about 2 minutes and 45 seconds to merge a 6-photo panorama shot on the Nikon D850 (full res. Running optimized Photoshop, the M1 Mac mini hit 130+ in run after run after run. What’s more, none of the computers we’ve reviewed, not even the most expensive 16-inch MacBook Pro you can buy or the Razer Blade Studio Edition, has ever broken the 100 mark on the PugetBench Photo Merge test. ![]() But even with this score working against it, the Mac mini running Apple Silicon-optimized Photoshop managed to get the second highest Overall score we’ve ever seen out of PugetBench. Unsurprisingly, the M1 Mac mini loses to the competition in raw GPU performance, more-or-less matching the onboard graphics of the quad-core Core i7 that’s in the 13-inch MacBook Pro ( full review here). Results: Apple Silicon vs Rosetta 2 vs Intel ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |